Cameron Burke RE SaaS - Platform Options Analysis¶
Created: 2025-12-21 Status: ANALYSIS COMPLETE Purpose: Evaluate build vs buy vs extend options before committing
Executive Summary¶
Based on 132 requirements compiled, we have 4 strategic options:
| Option | Approach | Est. Cost | Time to MVP | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | White-Label Realeflow | $3,500-6,000/yr | 2-4 weeks | LOW |
| B | No-Code (Bubble/Softr) | $5,000-15,000/yr | 2-3 months | MEDIUM |
| C | Hybrid (No-Code + Custom AI) | $15,000-40,000/yr | 4-6 months | MEDIUM |
| D | Full Custom Build | $75,000-150,000+ | 8-12 months | HIGH |
Recommended: Option C (Hybrid) - Balances speed, cost, and Cameron's unique differentiators.
Part 1: Platform Options Deep Dive¶
Option A: White-Label Existing Platform¶
Realeflow White-Label¶
Source: https://www.realeflow.com/ Pricing: $125-299/month base + white-label fees
What You Get: - AI-powered lead scoring - Deal analysis (Flip, BRRRR, Rental) - CRM and contact management - Direct mail integration - Comp analysis - Mobile app included
What's Missing (Cameron Unique): - Personal Financials (PFOS, DTI) - Cameron's methodology training - Video content integration - Portfolio-wide P&L - Buy Box matching - Cameron's specific pricing database
Pros: - Fastest time to market (2-4 weeks) - Proven, battle-tested platform - Mobile apps included - Support and updates handled
Cons: - Limited differentiation from competitors - Cameron's methodology CANNOT be embedded - No video training integration - Locked into their roadmap - Ongoing licensing fees ($3,000-6,000/yr) - Other Realeflow users = your direct competitors
Verdict: NOT RECOMMENDED - Defeats the purpose of Cameron's unique methodology
Option B: No-Code Platform Build¶
B1: Softr (Best for Speed)¶
Pricing: $49-139/month Backend: Google Sheets or Airtable
What You Get: - Client portal templates - Property listings - CRM functionality - Forms and data collection - Payment integration (Stripe) - User authentication - Mobile PWA (not native)
What's Missing: - Complex deal analysis wizards - Advanced AI/RAG integration - Video hosting/streaming - Native mobile apps
Pros: - 2-4 week MVP possible - Low cost ($600-1,700/yr) - Beautiful templates - Easy to maintain
Cons: - Limited calculation complexity - No native mobile apps - Scaling limits with Google Sheets - Custom AI integration difficult - Can look "template-y"
B2: Bubble.io (Best for Complexity)¶
Pricing: $32-349/month (usage-based)
What You Get: - Full web app capability - Complex workflows - Custom database - API integrations - Plugin marketplace - Reasonable AI plugins
What's Missing: - Native mobile (web wrapper only) - Advanced RAG without custom plugin - Video hosting (use external)
Pros: - Can build almost anything - Large developer community - Extensive plugin library - Can handle complex calculations
Cons: - Steep learning curve - Performance can be slow - Vendor lock-in (hard to migrate) - Usage-based pricing unpredictable - Finding Bubble experts: $75-150/hr
B3: Adalo (Best for Mobile)¶
Pricing: $45-200/month
What You Get: - Native iOS/Android apps - App store publishing - User-friendly interface - Good real estate templates
What's Missing: - Complex web app features - Advanced calculations - AI/RAG integration
Pros: - True native mobile apps - App store presence - Simpler than Bubble
Cons: - Less powerful than Bubble - Limited web features - Smaller community
Option C: Hybrid Approach (RECOMMENDED)¶
Concept: Use no-code for 80% of features, custom code for Cameron-unique differentiators
Architecture:¶
Portal] Bubble[Bubble.io
Core App] NextJS[Next.js
AI Features] end subgraph "API Layer" FastAPI[FastAPI Python] Scoring[Deal Scoring Engine] RAG[RAG Q&A
Cameron Content] Video[Video Timestamp
Linking] end subgraph "Data Layer" Postgres[(PostgreSQL
Core DB)] Qdrant[(Qdrant
Vectors)] R2[(Cloudflare R2
Videos/Files)] end Softr --> FastAPI Bubble --> FastAPI NextJS --> FastAPI FastAPI --> Scoring FastAPI --> RAG FastAPI --> Video Scoring --> Postgres RAG --> Qdrant Video --> R2 style Bubble fill:#3b82f6,color:#fff style FastAPI fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style Scoring fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style RAG fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style Qdrant fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
Split by Component:¶
| Component | Tool | Custom Code? |
|---|---|---|
| User Portal | Softr OR Bubble | No |
| Deal Analysis Forms | Bubble | No |
| SOW Estimation | Bubble + API | Partial |
| AI Deal Scoring | Custom FastAPI | YES |
| RAG "Ask Cameron" | Custom (Qdrant + Claude) | YES |
| Video Integration | Vimeo/Wistia API | Partial |
| Payments | Stripe | No |
| Resend | No |
Cost Breakdown: | Item | Monthly | Annual | |------|---------|--------| | Bubble (Team) | $149 | $1,788 | | Custom API hosting | $50-100 | $600-1,200 | | Qdrant Cloud | $25 | $300 | | Claude API | $50-200 | $600-2,400 | | Vimeo Pro | $20 | $240 | | Stripe | 2.9% + $0.30 | Variable | | Domain/SSL | $20 | $240 | | TOTAL | ~$350-550 | $4,000-6,500 |
Development Cost: | Phase | Effort | Cost (if outsourced) | |-------|--------|---------------------| | Bubble app build | 80-120 hrs | $8,000-15,000 | | Custom AI backend | 40-60 hrs | $6,000-10,000 | | Video integration | 20-30 hrs | $3,000-5,000 | | Testing + Polish | 40 hrs | $4,000-6,000 | | TOTAL | 180-250 hrs | $21,000-36,000 |
Time to MVP: 4-6 months (with dedicated team)
Pros: - Cameron's unique features ARE possible - AI scoring and RAG differentiation - Video integration achievable - Reasonable cost vs full custom - Can iterate quickly on no-code parts
Cons: - Two systems to maintain - Some technical complexity - Need to find Bubble + Python devs - Integration points can break
Option D: Full Custom Build¶
Tech Stack (2025 Best Practices): - Frontend: Next.js 14+ (React) - Backend: FastAPI (Python) or Node.js - Database: PostgreSQL + Qdrant - AI: Claude API + custom RAG - Video: Self-hosted or Mux - Hosting: Vercel + Railway or AWS - Payments: Stripe
Cost Breakdown: | Phase | Effort | Cost | |-------|--------|------| | Design + Spec | 80 hrs | $8,000-12,000 | | Backend API | 200 hrs | $25,000-35,000 | | Frontend Web | 160 hrs | $20,000-28,000 | | Mobile Apps | 160 hrs | $20,000-30,000 | | AI/RAG System | 80 hrs | $12,000-16,000 | | Video System | 40 hrs | $5,000-8,000 | | Testing/QA | 80 hrs | $8,000-12,000 | | DevOps/Deploy | 40 hrs | $5,000-8,000 | | TOTAL | 840+ hrs | $103,000-149,000 |
Ongoing Costs: | Item | Monthly | |------|---------| | Hosting (Vercel/Railway) | $100-500 | | Database (Supabase/Railway) | $25-100 | | Claude API | $100-500 | | Video hosting (Mux) | $100-300 | | Monitoring | $50 | | TOTAL | $375-1,450/mo |
Pros: - Complete control - No vendor lock-in - Maximum performance - Full differentiation possible - Own your IP completely
Cons: - Highest cost ($100k+) - Longest timeline (8-12 months) - Need full dev team - Ongoing maintenance burden - All bugs are your bugs
Part 2: Technology Stack Comparison¶
If Building Custom:¶
| Component | Option A | Option B | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontend | Next.js 14 | Remix | Next.js (larger ecosystem) |
| Backend | FastAPI | Node/Express | FastAPI (Python + AI) |
| Database | PostgreSQL | MySQL | PostgreSQL (better features) |
| ORM | Prisma | Drizzle | Prisma (more mature) |
| Vector DB | Qdrant | Pinecone | Qdrant (self-host option) |
| AI | Claude | GPT-4 | Claude (better reasoning) |
| Auth | Clerk | Auth0 | Clerk (simpler) |
| Payments | Stripe | Paddle | Stripe (standard) |
| Resend | SendGrid | Resend (dev-friendly) | |
| Video | Mux | Cloudflare Stream | Mux (HLS, analytics) |
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS | Vercel (simpler) |
If Using No-Code:¶
| Feature | Bubble | Softr | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deal Wizards | YES | Limited | Bubble |
| Client Portal | YES | YES | Either |
| AI Integration | Plugins | Limited | Bubble |
| Mobile | Web wrapper | PWA | Bubble (with wrapper) |
| Learning Curve | Steep | Easy | Softr for simple, Bubble for complex |
| Export Data | Limited | Good | Softr |
| Pricing Model | Usage-based | Flat | Softr more predictable |
Part 3: Cameron-Unique Features Feasibility¶
| Unique Feature | No-Code? | Hybrid? | Custom? |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Deal Scoring (G/Y/R) | NO | YES | YES |
| "Why" Explanations | NO | YES | YES |
| Video Timestamp Links | PARTIAL | YES | YES |
| RAG "Ask Cameron" | NO | YES | YES |
| PFOS Tracking | YES | YES | YES |
| Portfolio P&L | YES | YES | YES |
| Buy Box Matching | YES | YES | YES |
| Cameron Pricing DB | YES | YES | YES |
Bottom Line: Cameron's core differentiators (AI scoring + video integration + RAG) REQUIRE at least a hybrid approach.
Part 4: Recommendation¶
RECOMMENDED: Option C - Hybrid Approach¶
Why:
- Cost-Effective: $25k-40k vs $100k+ for full custom
- Time-Efficient: 4-6 months vs 8-12 months
- Differentiators Possible: AI scoring, RAG, video links all achievable
- Maintainable: No-code parts easy to update without devs
- Scalable: Can migrate custom parts later if needed
Proposed Architecture:¶
Alternative If Budget Constrained:¶
Start with Softr + Airtable ($1,200/yr) - Build basic portal with deal tracking - Prove market demand - Add custom AI layer later with revenue
Part 5: Next Steps¶
- Validate Requirements: Review with Cameron
- Choose Option: Hybrid (C) or Budget (B)
- Find Developer: Bubble expert + Python dev
- Create Detailed Spec: Screen-by-screen
- Build MVP: Phase 1 features only
- Beta Test: 10-20 users
- Iterate: Based on feedback
Part 6: Vendors/Resources to Evaluate¶
No-Code Developers:¶
- Airdev (Bubble agency) - Premium, $150-250/hr
- Zeroqode (Bubble plugins + dev)
- Upwork Bubble experts - $50-100/hr
- NoCodeDevs.com - Marketplace
AI/Custom Development:¶
- Curotec (from research) - Laravel, Vue, Python
- Toptal - Vetted freelancers
- In-house - Bert Frichot (you)
Hosting/Infrastructure:¶
- Vercel - Frontend hosting
- Railway.app - Backend + DB
- Qdrant Cloud - Vector search
- Cloudflare R2 - File storage
Summary Table¶
| Criteria | White-Label | No-Code | Hybrid | Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost (Year 1) | $3,500 | $8,000 | $30,000 | $120,000 |
| Time to MVP | 2-4 wks | 2-3 mo | 4-6 mo | 8-12 mo |
| AI Scoring | NO | NO | YES | YES |
| Video Links | NO | NO | YES | YES |
| RAG Q&A | NO | NO | YES | YES |
| Mobile App | YES | PWA | Wrapper | Native |
| Differentiation | LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH | HIGHEST |
| Maintenance | LOW | LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH |
| Risk | LOW | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | HIGH |
| Recommended | NO | MAYBE | YES | FUTURE |
Document Status: Complete Next Action: Review with Cameron, decide on approach