Skip to content

Cameron Burke RE SaaS - Platform Options Analysis

Created: 2025-12-21 Status: ANALYSIS COMPLETE Purpose: Evaluate build vs buy vs extend options before committing


Executive Summary

Based on 132 requirements compiled, we have 4 strategic options:

Option Approach Est. Cost Time to MVP Risk Level
A White-Label Realeflow $3,500-6,000/yr 2-4 weeks LOW
B No-Code (Bubble/Softr) $5,000-15,000/yr 2-3 months MEDIUM
C Hybrid (No-Code + Custom AI) $15,000-40,000/yr 4-6 months MEDIUM
D Full Custom Build $75,000-150,000+ 8-12 months HIGH

Recommended: Option C (Hybrid) - Balances speed, cost, and Cameron's unique differentiators.


Part 1: Platform Options Deep Dive

Option A: White-Label Existing Platform

Realeflow White-Label

Source: https://www.realeflow.com/ Pricing: $125-299/month base + white-label fees

What You Get: - AI-powered lead scoring - Deal analysis (Flip, BRRRR, Rental) - CRM and contact management - Direct mail integration - Comp analysis - Mobile app included

What's Missing (Cameron Unique): - Personal Financials (PFOS, DTI) - Cameron's methodology training - Video content integration - Portfolio-wide P&L - Buy Box matching - Cameron's specific pricing database

Pros: - Fastest time to market (2-4 weeks) - Proven, battle-tested platform - Mobile apps included - Support and updates handled

Cons: - Limited differentiation from competitors - Cameron's methodology CANNOT be embedded - No video training integration - Locked into their roadmap - Ongoing licensing fees ($3,000-6,000/yr) - Other Realeflow users = your direct competitors

Verdict: NOT RECOMMENDED - Defeats the purpose of Cameron's unique methodology


Option B: No-Code Platform Build

B1: Softr (Best for Speed)

Pricing: $49-139/month Backend: Google Sheets or Airtable

What You Get: - Client portal templates - Property listings - CRM functionality - Forms and data collection - Payment integration (Stripe) - User authentication - Mobile PWA (not native)

What's Missing: - Complex deal analysis wizards - Advanced AI/RAG integration - Video hosting/streaming - Native mobile apps

Pros: - 2-4 week MVP possible - Low cost ($600-1,700/yr) - Beautiful templates - Easy to maintain

Cons: - Limited calculation complexity - No native mobile apps - Scaling limits with Google Sheets - Custom AI integration difficult - Can look "template-y"


B2: Bubble.io (Best for Complexity)

Pricing: $32-349/month (usage-based)

What You Get: - Full web app capability - Complex workflows - Custom database - API integrations - Plugin marketplace - Reasonable AI plugins

What's Missing: - Native mobile (web wrapper only) - Advanced RAG without custom plugin - Video hosting (use external)

Pros: - Can build almost anything - Large developer community - Extensive plugin library - Can handle complex calculations

Cons: - Steep learning curve - Performance can be slow - Vendor lock-in (hard to migrate) - Usage-based pricing unpredictable - Finding Bubble experts: $75-150/hr


B3: Adalo (Best for Mobile)

Pricing: $45-200/month

What You Get: - Native iOS/Android apps - App store publishing - User-friendly interface - Good real estate templates

What's Missing: - Complex web app features - Advanced calculations - AI/RAG integration

Pros: - True native mobile apps - App store presence - Simpler than Bubble

Cons: - Less powerful than Bubble - Limited web features - Smaller community


Concept: Use no-code for 80% of features, custom code for Cameron-unique differentiators

Architecture:

graph TB subgraph "Frontend Layer" Softr[Softr
Portal] Bubble[Bubble.io
Core App] NextJS[Next.js
AI Features] end subgraph "API Layer" FastAPI[FastAPI Python] Scoring[Deal Scoring Engine] RAG[RAG Q&A
Cameron Content] Video[Video Timestamp
Linking] end subgraph "Data Layer" Postgres[(PostgreSQL
Core DB)] Qdrant[(Qdrant
Vectors)] R2[(Cloudflare R2
Videos/Files)] end Softr --> FastAPI Bubble --> FastAPI NextJS --> FastAPI FastAPI --> Scoring FastAPI --> RAG FastAPI --> Video Scoring --> Postgres RAG --> Qdrant Video --> R2 style Bubble fill:#3b82f6,color:#fff style FastAPI fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style Scoring fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style RAG fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style Qdrant fill:#6366f1,color:#fff

Split by Component:

Component Tool Custom Code?
User Portal Softr OR Bubble No
Deal Analysis Forms Bubble No
SOW Estimation Bubble + API Partial
AI Deal Scoring Custom FastAPI YES
RAG "Ask Cameron" Custom (Qdrant + Claude) YES
Video Integration Vimeo/Wistia API Partial
Payments Stripe No
Email Resend No

Cost Breakdown: | Item | Monthly | Annual | |------|---------|--------| | Bubble (Team) | $149 | $1,788 | | Custom API hosting | $50-100 | $600-1,200 | | Qdrant Cloud | $25 | $300 | | Claude API | $50-200 | $600-2,400 | | Vimeo Pro | $20 | $240 | | Stripe | 2.9% + $0.30 | Variable | | Domain/SSL | $20 | $240 | | TOTAL | ~$350-550 | $4,000-6,500 |

Development Cost: | Phase | Effort | Cost (if outsourced) | |-------|--------|---------------------| | Bubble app build | 80-120 hrs | $8,000-15,000 | | Custom AI backend | 40-60 hrs | $6,000-10,000 | | Video integration | 20-30 hrs | $3,000-5,000 | | Testing + Polish | 40 hrs | $4,000-6,000 | | TOTAL | 180-250 hrs | $21,000-36,000 |

Time to MVP: 4-6 months (with dedicated team)

Pros: - Cameron's unique features ARE possible - AI scoring and RAG differentiation - Video integration achievable - Reasonable cost vs full custom - Can iterate quickly on no-code parts

Cons: - Two systems to maintain - Some technical complexity - Need to find Bubble + Python devs - Integration points can break


Option D: Full Custom Build

Tech Stack (2025 Best Practices): - Frontend: Next.js 14+ (React) - Backend: FastAPI (Python) or Node.js - Database: PostgreSQL + Qdrant - AI: Claude API + custom RAG - Video: Self-hosted or Mux - Hosting: Vercel + Railway or AWS - Payments: Stripe

Cost Breakdown: | Phase | Effort | Cost | |-------|--------|------| | Design + Spec | 80 hrs | $8,000-12,000 | | Backend API | 200 hrs | $25,000-35,000 | | Frontend Web | 160 hrs | $20,000-28,000 | | Mobile Apps | 160 hrs | $20,000-30,000 | | AI/RAG System | 80 hrs | $12,000-16,000 | | Video System | 40 hrs | $5,000-8,000 | | Testing/QA | 80 hrs | $8,000-12,000 | | DevOps/Deploy | 40 hrs | $5,000-8,000 | | TOTAL | 840+ hrs | $103,000-149,000 |

Ongoing Costs: | Item | Monthly | |------|---------| | Hosting (Vercel/Railway) | $100-500 | | Database (Supabase/Railway) | $25-100 | | Claude API | $100-500 | | Video hosting (Mux) | $100-300 | | Monitoring | $50 | | TOTAL | $375-1,450/mo |

Pros: - Complete control - No vendor lock-in - Maximum performance - Full differentiation possible - Own your IP completely

Cons: - Highest cost ($100k+) - Longest timeline (8-12 months) - Need full dev team - Ongoing maintenance burden - All bugs are your bugs


Part 2: Technology Stack Comparison

If Building Custom:

Component Option A Option B Recommendation
Frontend Next.js 14 Remix Next.js (larger ecosystem)
Backend FastAPI Node/Express FastAPI (Python + AI)
Database PostgreSQL MySQL PostgreSQL (better features)
ORM Prisma Drizzle Prisma (more mature)
Vector DB Qdrant Pinecone Qdrant (self-host option)
AI Claude GPT-4 Claude (better reasoning)
Auth Clerk Auth0 Clerk (simpler)
Payments Stripe Paddle Stripe (standard)
Email Resend SendGrid Resend (dev-friendly)
Video Mux Cloudflare Stream Mux (HLS, analytics)
Hosting Vercel AWS Vercel (simpler)

If Using No-Code:

Feature Bubble Softr Recommendation
Deal Wizards YES Limited Bubble
Client Portal YES YES Either
AI Integration Plugins Limited Bubble
Mobile Web wrapper PWA Bubble (with wrapper)
Learning Curve Steep Easy Softr for simple, Bubble for complex
Export Data Limited Good Softr
Pricing Model Usage-based Flat Softr more predictable

Part 3: Cameron-Unique Features Feasibility

Unique Feature No-Code? Hybrid? Custom?
AI Deal Scoring (G/Y/R) NO YES YES
"Why" Explanations NO YES YES
Video Timestamp Links PARTIAL YES YES
RAG "Ask Cameron" NO YES YES
PFOS Tracking YES YES YES
Portfolio P&L YES YES YES
Buy Box Matching YES YES YES
Cameron Pricing DB YES YES YES

Bottom Line: Cameron's core differentiators (AI scoring + video integration + RAG) REQUIRE at least a hybrid approach.


Part 4: Recommendation

Why:

  1. Cost-Effective: $25k-40k vs $100k+ for full custom
  2. Time-Efficient: 4-6 months vs 8-12 months
  3. Differentiators Possible: AI scoring, RAG, video links all achievable
  4. Maintainable: No-code parts easy to update without devs
  5. Scalable: Can migrate custom parts later if needed

Proposed Architecture:

gantt title Tuff Flips SaaS Development Timeline dateFormat YYYY-MM section Phase 1 - MVP User auth & management :a1, 2026-01, 2w Property data entry :a2, after a1, 2w Deal analysis calculators :a3, after a2, 3w Expense tracking :a4, after a3, 2w Stripe payments :a5, after a4, 1w section Phase 2 - AI Layer AI Deal Scoring engine :b1, after a5, 3w Score explanations :b2, after b1, 2w Qdrant RAG system :b3, after b2, 3w Video integration :b4, after b3, 2w section Phase 3 - Polish Mobile wrapper :c1, after b4, 2w Advanced reports :c2, after c1, 2w Portfolio dashboard :c3, after c2, 2w Marketing site :c4, after c3, 2w
flowchart LR subgraph Phase1["Phase 1: MVP (2 months)"] B1[Bubble.io Core App] B1 --> Auth[User Auth] B1 --> Data[Property Entry] B1 --> Calc[Deal Analysis] B1 --> Exp[Expense Track] B1 --> Pay[Stripe Payments] end subgraph Phase2["Phase 2: AI Layer (2 months)"] P2[Custom FastAPI] P2 --> Score[AI Deal Scoring] P2 --> Explain[Score Explanations] P2 --> RAG[Qdrant RAG System] P2 --> Vid[Video Integration] end subgraph Phase3["Phase 3: Polish (2 months)"] Mob[Mobile Wrapper] Rep[Advanced Reports] Port[Portfolio Dashboard] Mkt[Marketing Site] end Phase1 --> Phase2 --> Phase3 style B1 fill:#3b82f6,color:#fff style P2 fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style Score fill:#22c55e,color:#fff style RAG fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

Alternative If Budget Constrained:

Start with Softr + Airtable ($1,200/yr) - Build basic portal with deal tracking - Prove market demand - Add custom AI layer later with revenue


Part 5: Next Steps

  1. Validate Requirements: Review with Cameron
  2. Choose Option: Hybrid (C) or Budget (B)
  3. Find Developer: Bubble expert + Python dev
  4. Create Detailed Spec: Screen-by-screen
  5. Build MVP: Phase 1 features only
  6. Beta Test: 10-20 users
  7. Iterate: Based on feedback

Part 6: Vendors/Resources to Evaluate

No-Code Developers:

  • Airdev (Bubble agency) - Premium, $150-250/hr
  • Zeroqode (Bubble plugins + dev)
  • Upwork Bubble experts - $50-100/hr
  • NoCodeDevs.com - Marketplace

AI/Custom Development:

  • Curotec (from research) - Laravel, Vue, Python
  • Toptal - Vetted freelancers
  • In-house - Bert Frichot (you)

Hosting/Infrastructure:

  • Vercel - Frontend hosting
  • Railway.app - Backend + DB
  • Qdrant Cloud - Vector search
  • Cloudflare R2 - File storage

Summary Table

Criteria White-Label No-Code Hybrid Custom
Cost (Year 1) $3,500 $8,000 $30,000 $120,000
Time to MVP 2-4 wks 2-3 mo 4-6 mo 8-12 mo
AI Scoring NO NO YES YES
Video Links NO NO YES YES
RAG Q&A NO NO YES YES
Mobile App YES PWA Wrapper Native
Differentiation LOW MEDIUM HIGH HIGHEST
Maintenance LOW LOW MEDIUM HIGH
Risk LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM HIGH
Recommended NO MAYBE YES FUTURE

Document Status: Complete Next Action: Review with Cameron, decide on approach